Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences

Document Type : Original Article(s)


1 Department of Phytopharmaceuticals (Traditional Pharmacy), School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Student Association of Indigenous Knowledge, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4 Clinical Education Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

5 Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

6 Medical Plants Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran


Background: Familiarizing students with knowledge-based businesses is one of the goals emphasized in the developed educational systems worldwide. This study aimed to design a startup-based learning model )SBL(.
Methods: As a qualitative research study, startup teams were formed by the pharmacy students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2020. This model was used to train 120 students as pharmaceutical entrepreneurs through related lectures, simulations, and field activities. We employed this model for students to become familiar with the various stages of examining market needs, knowledge-based company registration, intellectual property, logo design, and even pharmaceutical product development. Students’ feedback was assessed with a questionnaire designed by the team of researchers, and its results were used to analyze the course and improve the quality of the proposed model.
Results: Most of the studied indices revealed that the students rated this model as good or excellent. Satisfaction with more important indices includes student creativity and ideation in educational activity (60.7%), attractive presentation (60.4%), teamwork among learners (62.2%), appropriateness of evaluation method (65.4%), understanding how to make herbal remedies (49.1%), learner participation in the educational activity (74.8%), entrepreneurial motivation (60.7%), and applicability (64.4%).
Conclusion: We found this model effective in boosting students’ satisfaction, creativity, and entrepreneurial spirit. Lecturers also play a facilitator role in addition to specialized training. Therefore, in this model, both lecturers and students can grow more and make education more attractive. This study, for the first time, demonstrated that SBL could be applied in education systems and make the students more interested in educational content and help them to prepare for the job market.


  1. Shahiwala A. Entrepreneurship skills development through project-based activity in Bachelor of Pharmacy program. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017;9:698-706. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.017. PubMed PMID: 29233445.
  2. Nabi G, Liñán F, Fayolle A, Krueger N, Walmsley A. The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 2017;16:277-99. doi: 10.5465/amle.2015.0026.
  3. Vincett PS, Farlow S. “Start-a-Business”: an experiment in education through entrepreneurship. Journal of small business and enterprise development. 2008;15:274-88. doi: 10.1515/erj-2013-0038.
  4. Neck HM, Greene PG. Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of small business management. 2011;49:55-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.x.
  5. Johannisson B, Landstrom H, Rosenberg J. University training for entrepreneurship—an action frame of reference. European Journal of Engineering Education. 1998;23:477-96. doi: 10.1080/03043799808923526.
  6. Rae D, Carswell M. Using a life-story approach in researching entrepreneurial learning: the development of a conceptual model and its implications in the design of learning experiences. Education+ training. 2000;42:220-7. doi: 10.1108/00400910010373660.
  7. Bourgeois A. Entrepreneurship Education at School in Europe: National Strategies, Curricula and Learning Outcomes. Washington: ERIC; 2011.
  8. European Commissinn [Internet]. European policy cooperation (ET 2020 framework). [Cited: 25 September 2020]. Available from:
  9. Brazeau G. Entrepreneurial spirit in pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77:88. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77588. PubMed PMID: 23788800; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3687121.
  10. Sam AT, Parasuraman S. The nine-star pharmacist: an overview. Journal of Young pharmacists. 2015;7:281. doi: 10.5530/jyp.2015.4.1.
  11. Mason HL, Assemi M, Brown B, Cain JJ, Cox WC, Cutler SJ, et al. Report of the 2010-2011 Academic Affairs Standing Committee. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75:S12. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510S12. PubMed PMID: 22345735; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3279004.
  12. Rubino L, Freshman B. Developing entrepreneurial competencies in the healthcare management undergraduate classroom. J Health Adm Educ. 2005;22:399-416. PubMed PMID: 16485785.
  13. Education ACfP. Accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Chicago: Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education; 2015.
  14. Medina MS, Plaza CM, Stowe CD, Robinson ET, DeLander G, Beck DE, et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77:162. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778162. PubMed PMID: 24159203; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3806946.
  15. Competencies of general pharmacists in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2020. Persian.
  16. Laverty G, Hanna LA, Haughey S, Hughes C. Developing Entrepreneurial Skills in Pharmacy Students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79:106. doi: 10.5688/ajpe797106. PubMed PMID: 27168619; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4861177.
  17. Hermansen-Kobulnicky CJ, Moss CL. Pharmacy student entrepreneurial orientation: a measure to identify potential pharmacist entrepreneurs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2004;68:BM1. doi: 10.5688/aj6805113.
  18. Purdue University [Internet]. Cataloges of Purdue University 2020-2021. [cited: 25 September 2020]. Available from:
  19. Mattingly TJ, 2nd, Mullins CD, Melendez DR, Boyden K, Eddington ND. A Systematic Review of Entrepreneurship in Pharmacy Practice and Education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83:7233. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7233. PubMed PMID: 31065169; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6498207.
  20. UCL [Internet]. Pharmaceutical Formulation and Entrepreneurship MSc. [Cited: 25 September 2020]. Available from:
  21. USF [Internet]. Pharmacy Entrepreneurship, Leadership and Management. [Cited: 25 September 2020]. Available from:
  22. UGA Bulleti [Internet]. Pharmacy Entrepreneurship. [Cited: 25 September 2020]. Available from:
  23. Aldrich H, Dubini P. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business venturing. 1991;6:305-13. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(91)90021-5.
  24. Spigel B. The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 2017;41:49-72. doi: 10.1111%2Fetap.12167.
  25. Heinich R. Instructional technology and the structure of education. ECTJ. 1985;33:9-15. doi: 10.1007/BF02769337.
  26. Lefebvre P. Infusion of technology in the classroom: Implementing an instructional technology matrix to help teachers. Montréal: Concordia University; 2006.
  27. Nowruz D, Razavi S. Steps to educational design. 4th ed. Tehran: Samt publication; 2014. Persian.
  28. Torres A, Horodenska M, Witkowski G, Bielecki T, Torres K. High-Fidelity Hybrid Simulation: A Novel Approach to Teaching Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32:110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.12.001. PubMed PMID: 30529700.
  29. Moch SD, Roth D, Pederson A, Groh-Demers L, Siler J. Healthier work environments through action research. Nurs Manage. 1994;25:38-40. PubMed PMID: 8075951.
  30. He J, Huang X. Collaborative Online Teamwork: Exploring Students’ Satisfaction and Attitudes with Google Hangouts as a Supplementary Communication Tool. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2017;49:149-60. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2017.1327334.
  31. Wei X, Liu X, Sha J. How Does the Entrepreneurship Education Influence the Students’ Innovation? Testing on the Multiple Mediation Model. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01557. PubMed PMID: 31354574; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6636545.
  32. Oosterbeek H, Van Praag M, Ijsselstein A. The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European economic review. 2010;54:442-54. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002.
  33. Pittaway L, Edwards C. Assessment: examining practice in entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training. 2012;54:778-800. doi: 10.1108/00400911211274882.
  34. Gundry LK, Ofstein LF, Kickul JR. Seeing around corners: How creativity skills in entrepreneurship education influence innovation in business. The International Journal of Management Education. 2014;12:529-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2014.03.002.
  35. Papagiannis GD. Entrepreneurship education programs: The contribution of courses, seminars and competitions to entrepreneurial activity decision and to entrepreneurial spirit and mindset of young people in Greece. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 2018;21:1-21.
  36. Paek SH, Sumners SE. The indirect effect of teachers’ creative mindsets on teaching creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2019;53:298-311. doi: 10.1002/jocb.180.
  37. Ruskovaara E, Hämäläinen M, Pihkala T. HEAD teachers managing entrepreneurship education–Empirical evidence from general education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016;55:155-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.004.
  38. Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ. 1984;18:284-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01024.x. PubMed PMID: 6738402.
  39. Ten Cate O, Borleffs J, van Dijk M, Westerveld T, numerous faculty m, students involved in the subsequent Utrecht curricular r. Training medical students for the twenty-first century: Rationale and development of the Utrecht curriculum “CRU+”. Med Teach. 2018;40:461-6. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1435855. PubMed PMID: 29468920.