Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences

Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Journal Team

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

Neurocognitive Insights into Child Sexual Abuse Perpetrators: Understanding Cognitive and Emotional Profiles: A Case-Control Study

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Department of Neuroscience, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Social Sciences, FCAS, Canadian University Dubai, Dubai, UAE

3 Department of Law and Humanities, Islamic Azad University Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran

4 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran

5 Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavior Science, Ibn-E-Sina Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background: Child sexual abuse (CSA) is one of the most sensitive crimes in the world. Some perpetrators of CSA suffer from paraphilic disorders, including pedophilia (PE). This research is designed and implemented with the aim of neurocognitive evaluation of CSA perpetrators.
Methods: A case-control study was conducted over a period of 6 months from October 2022 to the end of March 2023 in Shiraz, Iran on the Experimental group (EG) (CSA perpetrators) (n=12) and the Control group (CG) (n=13). During these evaluations, information was obtained about sexual orientation, history of sexual activity, cognitive distortions, and cognitive performance of both groups. Physiological arousal factors were also measured using a polygraph device while participants viewed half-naked digital paintings of immature and adult individuals. Additionally, the study utilized functional near-infrared spectroscopy to measure hemodynamic changes in the left frontal pole (Fp1) and the right frontal pole (Fp2) while participants performed the Stroop task (ST). 
Results: Compared to CG, EG showed a greater tendency towards homosexuality in the past (P=0.017), present (P=0.019), and ideal (P=0.022). Using the mini-mental state examination, cognitive distortion was shown more common in the EG group (P=0.001). Additionally, there was a significant relationship between sexual abuse between the ages of 12 and 16 and committing a crime (P=0.041). Cognitive performance during ST was poorer in EG than CG. Moreover, in the statistical comparison between groups, the amount of oxyhemoglobin (HbO) and deoxyhemoglobin (HbR) was significantly different in areas Fp1 (HbO: P=0.006 and HbR: P=0.014) and Fp2 (HbO: P=0.008 and HbR: P=0.005). Based on polygraph data, EG exhibited less emotional control than CG when viewing half-nude images of children (skin conductance: P<0.001 and heart rate: P=0.004).
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the CSA perpetrators seem to have a poorer neurocognitive function than the control group.

Keywords

References
  1. Hillis S, Mercy J, Amobi A, Kress H. Global Prevalence of Past-year Violence Against Children: A Systematic Review and Minimum Estimates. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20154079. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4079. PubMed PMID: 26810785; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6496958.
  2. Organization WH. Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
  3. Stoltenborgh M, van Ijzendoorn MH, Euser EM, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. A global perspective on child sexual abuse: meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreat. 2011;16:79-101. doi: 10.1177/1077559511403920. PubMed PMID: 21511741.
  4. Barth J, Bermetz L, Heim E, Trelle S, Tonia T. The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2013;58:469-83. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0426-1. PubMed PMID: 23178922.
  5. Danaeifar M, Arshi M, Moghanibashi-Mansourieh A. Child sexual abuse in Iran: a systematic review of the prevalence, risk factors, consequences, interventions and laws. J Inj Violence Res. 2022;14:225-36. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v14i3.1754. PubMed PMID: 35906873; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC9805664.
  6. Smid WJ, Wever EC. Mixed Emotions: An Incentive Motivational Model of Sexual Deviance. Sex Abuse. 2019;31:731-64. doi: 10.1177/1079063218775972. PubMed PMID: 29779451.
  7. Hokmabadi A, Khoori E, Tatari M, Wurtele SK. Preventing child sexual abuse in Iran: Mothers teaching body safety to their sons. J Res Dev Nurs Midw. 2022;19:31-6. doi: 10.61186/jgbfnm.19.2.31.
  8. Tenkorang EY, Owusu AY. A life course understanding of domestic and intimate partner violence in Ghana. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;79:384-94. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.027. PubMed PMID: 29529592.
  9. Afifi TO, MacMillan HL, Boyle M, Cheung K, Taillieu T, Turner S, et al. Child abuse and physical health in adulthood. Health Rep. 2016;27:10-8. PubMed PMID: 26983007.
  10. Afifi TO, MacMillan HL, Boyle M, Taillieu T, Cheung K, Sareen J. Child abuse and mental disorders in Canada. CMAJ. 2014;186:E324-32. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131792. PubMed PMID: 24756625; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4050024.
  11. Faupel S. Etiology of adult sexual offending. Sex offender management assessment and planning initiative research brief. 2015.
  12. Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Christensen BK, Dickey R, Klassen PE, Beckstead AL, et al. Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology. 2004;18:3-14. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.3. PubMed PMID: 14744183.
  13. Cantor JM, Klassen PE, Dickey R, Christensen BK, Kuban ME, Blak T, et al. Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34:447-59. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-4344-7. PubMed PMID: 16010467.
  14. Blanchard R, Kuban ME, Klassen P, Dickey R, Christensen BK, Cantor JM, et al. Self-reported head injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and nonpedophilic men referred for clinical assessment. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32:573-81. doi: 10.1023/a:1026093612434. PubMed PMID: 14574100.
  15. Schmidt AF, Mokros A, Banse R. Is pedophilic sexual preference continuous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychol Assess. 2013;25:1146-53. doi: 10.1037/a0033326. PubMed PMID: 23815115.
  16. Gerwinn H, Weiss S, Tenbergen G, Amelung T, Fodisch C, Pohl A, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with paedophilia and child sex offending - Differentiating sexual preference from offence status. Eur Psychiatry. 2018;51:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.002. PubMed PMID: 29625377.
  17. Seto MC, Lalumière ML. A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2001;13:15-25. doi: 10.1177/107906320101300103.
  18. Curnoe S, Langevin R. Personality and deviant sexual fantasies: an examination of the MMPIs of sex offenders. J Clin Psychol. 2002;58:803-15. doi: 10.1002/jclp.2006. PubMed PMID: 12205720.
  19. Abel GG, Huffman J, Warberg B, Holland CL. Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 1998;10:81-95. doi: 10.1177/107906329801000202.
  20. Spada AH, Jeglic EL. A cognitive-based indicator of deviant sexual interest: Concurrent validation of the Stroop task. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 2016;22:246-62. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2015.1078000.
  21. Cantor JM, McPhail IV. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1940-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. PubMed PMID: 26272778.
  22. Wilcox DT, Collins N. Polygraph: The use of polygraphy in the assessment and treatment of sex offenders in the UK. European Polygraph. 2020;14:55-62. doi: 10.2478/ep-2020-0019.
  23. Sartorius A, Ruf M, Kief C, Demirakca T, Bailer J, Ende G, et al. Abnormal amygdala activation profile in pedophilia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;258:271-7. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0782-2. PubMed PMID: 18504635.
  24. Walter M, Witzel J, Wiebking C, Gubka U, Rotte M, Schiltz K, et al. Pedophilia is linked to reduced activation in hypothalamus and lateral prefrontal cortex during visual erotic stimulation. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62:698-701. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.10.018. PubMed PMID: 17400196.
  25. Ponseti J, Granert O, Jansen O, Wolff S, Beier K, Neutze J, et al. Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:187-94. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.130. PubMed PMID: 21969422.
  26. Boas DA, Elwell CE, Ferrari M, Taga G. Twenty years of functional near-infrared spectroscopy: introduction for the special issue. Neuroimage. 2014;85:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.033. PubMed PMID: 24321364.
  27. Price SA, Karl Hanson R. A modified Stroop task with sexual offenders: Replication of a study. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 2007;13:203-16. doi: 10.1080/13552600701785505.
  28. Schmidt AF, Babchishin KM, Lehmann RJB. A Meta-Analysis of Viewing Time Measures of Sexual Interest in Children. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:287-300. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0806-3. PubMed PMID: 27543106.
  29. Dombert B, Antfolk J, Kallvik L, Zappalà A, Osterheider M, Mokros A, et al. Identifying pedophilic interest in sex offenders against children with the indirect choice reaction time task. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2015;33.
  30. Kooiman CG, Ouwehand AW, ter Kuile MM. The Sexual and Physical Abuse Questionnaire (SPAQ). A screening instrument for adults to assess past and current experiences of abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2002;26:939-53. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00363-0. PubMed PMID: 12433137.
  31. Sagayaraj K, Gopal CR. Development of sexual orientation scale. Journal of Psychosexual Health. 2020;2:224-32. doi: 10.1177/2631831820939807.
  32. Baúto RV, Cardoso J, Leal I. Preliminary validation of bumby RAPE and MOLEST scales: Exploratory factorial analysis. Annals of medicine. 2021;53:S169. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1896190.
  33. Cameron P. Homosexual molestation of children/sexual interaction of teacher and pupil. Psychol Rep. 1985;57:1227-36. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1985.57.3f.1227. PubMed PMID: 4095235.
  34. Kaplan HI. Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry. 12th ed. Atlanta: Wolters Kluwer; 2022.
  35. Arkowitz S, Vess J. An evaluation of the Bumby RAPE and MOLEST scales as measures of cognitive distortions with civilly committed sexual offenders. Sex Abuse. 2003;15:237-49. doi: 10.1177/107906320301500402. PubMed PMID: 14571531.
  36. Blumenthal S, Gudjonsson G, Burns J. Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex offenders against adults and children. Child Abuse Negl. 1999;23:129-43. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(98)00117-3. PubMed PMID: 10075183.
  37. Ogloff JR, Cutajar MC, Mann E, Mullen P, Wei FTY, Hassan HAB, et al. Child sexual abuse and subsequent offending and victimisation: A 45 year follow-up study. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. 2012:1-6. doi: 10.52922/ti251190.
  38. Ó Ciardha C, Gormley M. Comparing two implicit cognitive measures of sexual interest: A pictorial modified Stroop task and the Implicit Association Test. Wiley Online Library; 2009. p. 177-201. doi: 10.1002/9780470747551.ch9.
  39. Ciardha CO, Gormley M. Using a pictorial-modified stroop task to explore the sexual interests of sexual offenders against children. Sex Abuse. 2012;24:175-97. doi: 10.1177/1079063211407079. PubMed PMID: 21903978.
  40. Bludau S, Eickhoff SB, Mohlberg H, Caspers S, Laird AR, Fox PT, et al. Cytoarchitecture, probability maps and functions of the human frontal pole. Neuroimage. 2014;93:260-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.052. PubMed PMID: 23702412; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5325035.
  41. Mannfolk C, Liberg B, Abe C, Rahm C. Altered Neural and Behavioral Response to Sexually Implicit Stimuli During a Pictorial-Modified Stroop Task in Pedophilic Disorder. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023;3:292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.02.004. PubMed PMID: 37124357; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC10140453.
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume 50, Issue 5
May 2025
Pages 304-315
Files
History
  • Received: 30 June 2024
  • Revised: 19 August 2024
  • Accepted: 15 September 2024
Share
How to cite
Statistics