Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences

Document Type : Letter(s) to the Editor

Authors

1 Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

2 Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Regional Perinatal Center, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

3 Hospital Therapy Department No. 2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

4 Scientific and Practical Center, Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

5 Department of Natural Sciences, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

6 Department of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a major public health challenge worldwide.

Highlights

Nurgul Ablakimova (Google Scholar)

Keywords

Dear Editor

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a major public health challenge worldwide. 1 Empirical antimicrobial therapy for CAP must balance broad-spectrum coverage with judicious use to address rising antibiotic resistance. Therefore, establishing microbiological epidemiology data is essential to propose the most appropriate treatment.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered the etiology of adult lung injury, with a greater emphasis on viruses. However, its impact on the causative structure of CAP remains unclear.

We conducted a cross-sectional study from January to June 2024 in two multidisciplinary hospitals in Aktobe, Kazakhstan, to evaluate the etiology of CAP in the post-COVID period. This study was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of the West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University (Approval no:1; dated 24.01.2023). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study included 184 hospitalized adults diagnosed with CAP. Examination and treatment followed clinical practice and local guidelines. To determine the etiology of CAP, culture testing of lower respiratory tract samples (sputum) was performed, along with rapid urinary antigen tests for Legionella and Streptococcus (S.) pneumoniae (Vegal Pharmaceuticals, Spain). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing for atypical pathogens (Mycoplasmoides pneumoniae and Chlamydia (C.) pneumonia) was conducted using the DT-95 DNA amplifier (DNA Technology, Russia). Additionally, immunochromatographic rapid tests for influenza A/B and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen detection were performed using respiratory swabs (Rapid Bio, Russia). Immunochromatographic rapid tests were conducted for all patients; urinary antigen tests were performed in severe CAP cases, and sputum cultures or PCR testing were carried out for patients able to provide sputum samples. Key characteristics, comorbidities, and diagnostic method distribution are detailed in table 1.

Demographic characteristics Value
Age, years (median [IQR]) 55 (35.5-69)
Sex (n, %) Female 104 (56.5%)
Male 80 (43.5)
Comorbidities (n, %) Arterial hypertension 98 (53.3%)
COPD 31 (16.8%)
CHF 40 (21.7%)
Anemia 38 (20.7%)
Diabetes mellitus 28 (15.2%)
Ischemic heart disease 30 (16.3%)
Diagnostic approaches (n, %) Immunochromatographic rapid tests 184 (100%)
PCR testing 92 (50%)
Culture testing 91 (49.5%)
Rapid urinary antigen tests 22 (12%)
Outcomes Length of stay (days, median [IQR]) 8 (7; 9)
Hospital mortality (n, %) 8 (4.3%)
COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHF: Chronic heart failure; PCR: Polymerase chain reaction
Table 1.Baseline characteristics of patients with post-COVID pneumonia in Aktobe, Kazakhstan

Among 91 sputum samples collected for culture testing, 60 were excluded after bacterial microscopy and were not further cultivated. PCR testing was performed on 94 respiratory samples. An etiological diagnosis was established in 53 (28.8%) patients using at least one diagnostic method. Among 61 detected pathogens, the most prevalent were M. pneumoniae 21 (34.4%), S. pneumoniae 12 (19.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae 7 (11.5%), C. pneumoniae 6 (9.8%), and Moraxella catarrhalis 6 (9.8%) cases (figure 1). Viruses were less common, with only 1 case of SARS-CoV-2 infection was identified. Co-infections were observed in 18.9% of patients with established etiological diagnoses, including the following combinations: M.pneumoniae+S.pneumonia (2 cases, 3.8%), C.pneumoniae+S.pneumoniae (2 cases, 3.8%), C.pneumoniae+Haemophilus (H.) influenza (2 cases, 3.8%), M.pneumoniae+H.influenzae (2 cases, 3.8%), M.pneumoniae+M.catarrhalis (1 case, 1.9%), and M.pneumoniae+SARS-CoV-2 (1 case, 1.9%).

Figure 1. The bar chart illustrates the frequency of different pathogens in patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Aktobe, Kazakhstan.

To our knowledge, this is the first post-COVID-19 study in Kazakhstan to examine CAP etiology in hospitalized adults, using comprehensive PCR and point-of-care (POC) testing.

In the pre-antibiotic era, pneumococcus caused 90-95% of pneumonia cases. However, its prevalence has significantly declined due to widespread pneumococcal vaccination, reduced smoking, early empiric antibiotic use, and improved PCR diagnostics which enabled better detection of atypical and viral pathogens. 2

Large pre-pandemic studies indicated viral pathogens were more prevalent than bacterial causes in pneumonia cases. 3 However, the findings of the present study indicated only one case of SARS-CoV-2, and no influenza A and B viruses were detected.

The prevalence of atypical pathogens such as M. pneumoniae over pneumococcus might stem from poor sputum quality, underestimating pneumococcal pneumonia. Conventional culture, the gold standard for bacterial detection in CAP, has limited sensitivity and serotype identification, especially in adults. 4 Additionally, antibiotic pretreatment further diminishes bacterial culture sensitivity. In the present study, one-third of pneumococcal cases were detected using rapid urinary antigen tests, which were not affected by previous antibiotic use, and thus provide a reliable detection method despite prior therapy. The patient population indicated frequent hospitalization of patients with mild pneumonia who could have been managed outpatient. This hospitalization pattern might also influence the CAP etiology. Notably, we detected a predominance of M. pneumoniae infections, consistent with its known epidemiological pattern of regional outbreaks occurring every 3-7 years and lasting 1-2 years. This finding was consistent with other post-pandemic reports of increased M. pneumoniae detection in adults. 5

In conclusion, the etiology of CAP in adults in our region appeared unchanged from the pre-COVID era. Given the frequent detection of hard-to-culture bacteria, broader PCR use in clinical practice is recommended. An important consideration was that many pneumonia patients either could not produce sputum or provided poor-quality samples, which significantly compromised microscopy-based diagnostic pathways. To address this limitation, broader implementation of POC testing should be prioritized. These rapid diagnostic tools enable reliable CAP etiology determination even when traditional culture-based methods are precluded by insufficient or poor-quality biological specimens.

Authors’ Contribution

N.A: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing original draft; S.R: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, supervision, reviewing and editing; G.S: Supervision, reviewing and editing; A.M, S.S, D.S, S.K, H.R: Data curation, reviewing and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. Zhou F, Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu X, Gu L, Zhang X, et al. Disease severity and clinical outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia caused by non-influenza respiratory viruses in adults: a multicentre prospective registry study from the CAP-China Network. Eur Respir J. 2019; 54DOI | PubMed
  2. Yasuo S, Murata M, Nakagawa N, Kawasaki T, Yoshida T, Ando K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of urinary antigen tests for pneumococcal pneumonia among patients with acute respiratory failure suspected pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022; 12:e057216. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  3. Alimi Y, Lim WS, Lansbury L, Leonardi-Bee J, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS. Systematic review of respiratory viral pathogens identified in adults with community-acquired pneumonia in Europe. J Clin Virol. 2017; 95:26-35. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  4. Ogawa H, Kitsios GD, Iwata M, Terasawa T. Sputum Gram Stain for Bacterial Pathogen Diagnosis in Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and Yield. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71:499-513. Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]
  5. Goeijenbier M, van der Bie S, Souverein D, Bolluyt D, Nagel M, Stoof SP, et al. Post COVID-19 Pandemic Increased Detection of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae in Adults Admitted to the Intensive Care. J Clin Med. 2024; 13Publisher Full Text | DOI | PubMed [ PMC Free Article ]