Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences

Document Type : Original Article(s)

Authors

1 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Department of Public Health, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran

4 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

10.30476/ijms.2025.107579.4208

Abstract

Background: Efforts to improve prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome have been made, with amniocentesis representing an invasive procedure, and maternal serum biochemical markers are among the non-invasive options. This study aimed to examine the association between serum biochemical marker values and amniocentesis results in the prenatal diagnostics of Down syndrome in early pregnancy.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, data from pregnant women in the first trimester undergoing amniocentesis test for the diagnosis of fetal genetic diseases were collected during 2021-2022. Maternal weight, maternal age, gestational age at nuchal translucency (NT) scan, nasal bone (NB) status, and serum chemical biomarkers—including pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), and beta-human chorionic gonadotropins (β-hCG) were assessed. 
Results: Of 1,987 amniocentesis cases, 96.5% were normal, and 3.5% were abnormal. Down syndrome was present in approximately 3% of cases. Maternal weight was significantly lower in the abnormal amniocentesis group than in the normal group. After adjusting for maternal weight, maternal age, NT, and β-hCG were significantly higher in the abnormal amniocentesis group, whereas PAPP-A was lower. The NB status did not differ between groups. A PAPP-A level of <0.42 multiple of median (MoM) (sensitivity=90%, specificity=68%) and a β-hCG level of ≥1.52 MoM (sensitivity=76%, specificity=70%) acceptably predicted Down syndrome in abnormal amniocentesis cases. Among the 69 abnormal amniocentesis cases, 49 cases had Down syndrome; of these, 75.5% had a Down syndrome risk of ≤1:100.
Conclusion: Both β-hCG and PAPP-A had independent diagnostic value in predicting Down syndrome in early pregnancy. It is recommended that a Down syndrome risk of up to 1:100 warrant direct amniocentesis, while cases with a risk greater than 1:100 should be offered non-invasive alternatives.

Highlights

Maryam Kasraeian (Google Scholar)
Azam Faraji (Google Scholar)

Keywords

  1. Shiefa S, Amargandhi M, Bhupendra J, Moulali S, Kristine T. First Trimester Maternal Serum Screening Using Biochemical Markers PAPP-A and Free beta-hCG for Down Syndrome, Patau Syndrome and Edward Syndrome. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013;28:3-12. doi: 10.1007/s12291-012-0269-9. PubMed PMID: 24381414; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3547446.
  2. Sadlecki P, Walentowicz-Sadlecka M, Pasinska M, Adamczak R, Grabiec M. [Indications for genetic amniocentesis investigated at the Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Oncologic Gynecology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz]. Ginekol Pol. 2014;85:420-3. PubMed PMID: 25029805.
  3. Dey M, Sharma S, Aggarwal S. Prenatal screening methods for aneuploidies. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5:182-90. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.109180. PubMed PMID: 23626953; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3632021.
  4. Smith GC, Stenhouse EJ, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, Cameron AD, Connor JM. Early pregnancy levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein a and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth, preeclampsia, and stillbirth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1762-7. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8430. PubMed PMID: 11932314.
  5. Carbone L, Cariati F, Sarno L, Conforti A, Bagnulo F, Strina I, et al. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges. Genes (Basel). 2020;12. doi: 10.3390/genes12010015. PubMed PMID: 33374411; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7824607.
  6. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Williams obstetrics. 24th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
  7. Vafaei H, Hadipour N, Kasraeian M, Yoosefi S, Alamdarloo SM, Asadi N, et al. Accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography for diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum and risk factors in a tertiary center in southern Iran: one-year placenta accreta in Iran. Galen Med J. 2024;13:e3316. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v13i.3316.
  8. American College of O, Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1459-67. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291570.63450.44. PubMed PMID: 18055749.
  9. Loncar D, Varjacic M, Novakovic T, Milovanovic D, Jankovic S. Correlation between serum biochemical markers and early amniocentesis in diagnosis of congenital fetal anomalies. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2010;10:9-14. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2010.2726. PubMed PMID: 20192924; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5596620.
  10. Akbarzadeh-Jahromi M, Todarbary N, Aslani FS, Najib F, Zare M, Amirmoezi F, et al. Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential: a retrospective evaluation of clinical pathology and immunohistochemistry features. Surg Exp Pathol. 2024;7:2. doi: 10.1186/s42047-024-00145-5.
  11. Semati A, Zare M, Mirahmadizadeh A, Hemmati A, Ebrahimi M. Epidemiological Study of Infection and Death Due to COVID-19 in Fars Province, Iran, From February to September 2020. Iran J Med Sci. 2022;47:219-26. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2021.90768.2174. PubMed PMID: 35634523; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9126892.
  12. Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1315-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d. PubMed PMID: 20736804.
  13. Faraji A, Gharibpour F, Namazi N, Shakiba AM, Kasraeian M, Asadi N, et al. Foramen Ovale Pulsatility Index as an Early Affected Doppler Study among Abnormal Growth Fetuses: A Recent Insight for Practice Based on a Prospective Study. Iran J Med Sci. 2024;49:632-42. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2024.100177.3231. PubMed PMID: 39449775; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11497320.
  14. Delkhosh F, Navinezhad M, Sharifzadeh M, Naghibinasab MS, Eftekhar Yazdi M. Prevalence of aneuploidy in pregnant women with high risk fetal screening in Sabzevar perinatal clinic, 2016–2019. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2022;25:31-8.
  15. Shahshahan Z. The diagnostic value of combined test for trisomy 21 and 18 screening in over 35-years old pregnant women in the gestational age of 9–14 weeks. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2013;31:400-7. Persian.
  16. Mirsafaie M, Moghaddam-Banaem L, Kheirollahi M. The Relationship between Screening Markers in the First Trimester of Pregnancy and Chromosome Aberrations. Int J Prev Med. 2022;13:81. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_572_20. PubMed PMID: 35706851; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9188895.
  17. Huang T, Meschino WS, Okun N, Dennis A, Hoffman B, Lepage N, et al. The impact of maternal weight discrepancies on prenatal screening results for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:471-6. doi: 10.1002/pd.4090. PubMed PMID: 23512612.
  18. Ziolkowska K, Dydowicz P, Sobkowski M, Tobola-Wrobel K, Wysocka E, Pietryga M. The clinical usefulness of biochemical (free beta-hCg, PaPP-a) and ultrasound (nuchal translucency) parameters in prenatal screening of trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90:161-6. doi: 10.5603/GP.2019.0029. PubMed PMID: 30950006.
  19. Faraji A, Alborzi S, Moradi Alamdarloo S, Kasraeian M, Vafaei H, Asadi N, et al. High level serum inhibin-A in 1st and 2nd pregnancy trimesters as a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pars J Med Sci. 2022;18:25-34. doi: 10.52547/jmj.18.4.4. Persian.
  20. Canick JA, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Palomaki GE, Neveux LM, Malone FD, Ball RH, et al. Comparison of serum markers in first-trimester down syndrome screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1192-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000241095.19638.f2. PubMed PMID: 17077242.
  21. Kilercik M, Yozgat I, Serdar MA, Aksungar F, Göğüş S, Solak S, et al. What are the predominant parameters for Down syndrome risk estimation in first-trimester screening: a data mining study. Turk J Biochem. 2022;47:704-9. doi: 10.1515/tjb-2022-0004.
  22. Moreno-Cid M, Rubio-Lorente A, Rodriguez MJ, Bueno-Pacheco G, Tenias JM, Roman-Ortiz C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of second-trimester nasal bone assessment in detection of fetuses with Down syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:247-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.13228. PubMed PMID: 24151178.
  23. Orlandi F, Bilardo CM, Campogrande M, Krantz D, Hallahan T, Rossi C, et al. Measurement of nasal bone length at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy and its potential role in Down syndrome risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:36-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.167. PubMed PMID: 12858300.
  24. Has R, Kalelioglu I, Yuksel A, Ibrahimoglu L, Ermis H, Yildirim A. Fetal nasal bone assessment in first trimester down syndrome screening. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24:61-6. doi: 10.1159/000132409. PubMed PMID: 18504384.
  25. Patil M, Panchanadikar TM, Wagh G. Variation of papp-a level in the first trimester of pregnancy and its clinical outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64:116-9. doi: 10.1007/s13224-013-0481-4. PubMed PMID: 24757339; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3984652.
  26. Hsu JJ, Ou YC, Chen KC, Hsieh TT, Soong YK. High maternal serum free beta-hCG levels in Down syndrome pregnancies: a preliminary report. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1996;19:36-41. PubMed PMID: 8935373.
  27. Yaron Y, Ochshorn Y, Tsabari S, Shira AB. First-trimester nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A can detect triploidy and determine the parental origin. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:445-50. doi: 10.1002/pd.898. PubMed PMID: 15229844.
  28. Grande M, Jansen FA, Blumenfeld YJ, Fisher A, Odibo AO, Haak MC, et al. Genomic microarray in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:650-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.14880. PubMed PMID: 25900824.